Dana O'Neill
has been all over the myriad of sub-subjects involved with college
basketball recruiting and academics this month and her latest column is
another good one. Yes, some kids do just need the right setting and backing
in order to blossom, as she points out.
Her writings brought to mind that
there are also a percentage of kids who just aren't going to 'succeed'
in school, be it high school or college, for a myriad of factors (yes,
often self-inflicted) yet what roundball vocation options are available to them?
Not
that such possibilities are anyone's or any organization's obligation
because this involves the world of work -- an official exchange of
skills for a set salary -- but how many 17, 18 or 19-year-olds are
body-and-mind skilled ready for playing overseas, let alone the
developmental league?
There is a tendency to jam on
these young men but there are plenty of people for who a college
setting, even the community college level, is inappropriate and these
individuals enter the work force post high school.
But the difference is they aren't competing with adult men but rather in
entry level positions. Basketball doesn't have this, at least not tied
to also simultaneously performing in the classroom.
All in all, there are so many more serious issues needing addressing but our one size fits all approach post-high school basketball approach is underserving.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment