Charles Barkley is right

Sports stars are not and should not be cast into the category of being considered role models. Most, if not all, don't asked to be such -- it's as if that's a required addendum that comes with performing in the public arena. Label it a 'if you want to be in this profession, well, it comes with this responsibility and that element of encumbrance.'

Yes, athletes have certain talents not possessed by the vast majority of the general public but those abilities says nothing about who they are as persons and the quality of their day-to-day human interactions.

For example, is someone who excels on a field, rink, court, diamond or track but beats his or her spouse/children or runs a scam charity still a worthy sports role model? Yes, the fact remains they are still averaging 25 points a game or hitting 50 home runs a season but the shininess now comes with a ding, or in some cases, a gaping hole.

Fans often feel betrayed when it is revealed that some publicized personal behavior demonstrates feet of clay, or worse, but keep in mind no star athlete asks that you consider him or her as a deity. That exalted status is applied by the fan.

Admire the skills but give role model status to those who sacrifice for the betterment of others. Like so many parents and coaches plus those who amply if often silently demonstrate their goal is to leave the world a better place during their lifetimes.